Klavan correctly identifies what happened as evil, pure and unadulterated. It is something that "... each of us is in a constant daily battle against a dark and insinuating force of wickedness that is not only above us but all around us and within us as well." And that day it destroyed a large number of lives, not just the ones who died.
He then turns to the political reactions which took the predictable lines of gun control/no gun control and first says regarding categorizing oponents as evil:
"I hate when people use the word evil when discussing normal American politics. I never used it to describe Barack Obama, whose policies I detested. I won't use it to describe Donald Trump, whose behavior I sometimes deplore. Misused to describe flawed but striving men like these, the word evil is merely a means of demonizing those you disagree with, of shutting down civil debate. It frees you from the responsibility of democratic discourse."
"Understood rightly though, the concept of evil should increase our compassion even for our opponents. It allows us to understand that they are in the same struggle we're in, prone to the same failures, subject to the same defeats. Deep down, our political opponents are painfully aware of the fragility of their own decency, terrified that others will see the blackness of their hearts, and constantly signaling their virtue as a way to mitigate their own self-disgust and fear. Just like you. Just like me."
He then quotes Mollie Hemingway on Fox News with a correct analysis of the political responses of the Left and Right when she said:
"We're pretending we're having a debate about gun control but we're really having a debate about the nature of evil and whether a big enough government can contain it."
There is no government big enough to contain evil - just restrain it as much as reasonably possible.
And where does that leave us as individuals? The antidote for evil is the individual responses of people in Las Vegas, and in Boston during the bombing there, and in New York on 9/11 when men and women looked evil in the face and ran toward danger, not away. He lists a few of the heroes in Las Vegas:
"My novelist heart was touched to hear that one of the great heroes of the Las Vegas massacre was a man named Jonathan Smith. I mean, really. John Smith — the ultimate everyman moniker — I wouldn't have dared to make that up. The 30-year-old copy machine repairman is said to have helped thirty people escape the kill zone before taking a bullet in the neck — and then another hero, an off-duty cop named Tom McGrath, saved him."
And where does that leave us as individuals? The antidote for evil is the individual responses of people in Las Vegas, and in Boston during the bombing there, and in New York on 9/11 when men and women looked evil in the face and ran toward danger, not away. He lists a few of the heroes in Las Vegas:
"My novelist heart was touched to hear that one of the great heroes of the Las Vegas massacre was a man named Jonathan Smith. I mean, really. John Smith — the ultimate everyman moniker — I wouldn't have dared to make that up. The 30-year-old copy machine repairman is said to have helped thirty people escape the kill zone before taking a bullet in the neck — and then another hero, an off-duty cop named Tom McGrath, saved him."
In so doing:
" ... we see the only real response to darkness humans have ever had: individual courage, sacrifice and nobility. In fact, individuals win victories against evil every day — when they tell the hard truth rather than the easy lie or speak words of kindness when they'd rather lash out. And in those moments when evil rises rampant, their victories sometimes become spectacular as they rush into the teeth of death to help both strangers and friends."
Agreed. There is no greater love (John 15:13) and in the end, the very end, such love by the One who is good will finally banish evil and He will not forget those who lived out His message when it counted.
No comments:
Post a Comment